Click here to live chat with one of our writers between 9am-5pm CST.
Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor
From Ballotpedia
Contents |
Ballot measure campaigns
2010
Legend:
|
In 2010, Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor provided legal services for eight of the statewide propositions on the California ballot.
- Proposition 14: $649,101
- Proposition 16: $1,326,627
- Proposition 17: $472,087
- Proposition 20: $385,321
- Proposition 21: $13,231
- Proposition 22: $484,070
- Proposition 24: $210,522
- Proposition 26: $343,025
2009
| Ballot proposition | Firm's side | Fees received | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| California Proposition 1A (May 2009) (Budget Reform Now) | Yes | About $397,000 | [2] |
2008
| Ballot proposition | Firm's side | Fees received | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proposition 7 | No | About $654,000 | [3] |
| Proposition 91 | No | About $27,000 | [4] |
| Prop 98 and Prop 99 | No on 98, Yes on 99 | About $613,000 | [5] |
2006
| Ballot proposition | Firm's side | Fees received | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proposition 87 | No | About $651,700 | [6] |
| Proposition 88 | Yes | About $111,000 | [7] |
2005
| Ballot proposition | Firm's side | Fees received | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prop 74 and Prop 76 | Yes | About $1,071,200 | [8] |
See also
- California political consultants
- Vendors and consultants to California's 2010 ballot proposition campaigns
External links
References
- ↑ Mercury News, "Cupertino joins battle against plan to divert local gas tax to state fund", July 20, 2009
- ↑ Expenditure records of Budget Reform Now
- ↑ Expenditure records of "No on 7"
- ↑ Expenditure records of "No on 91"
- ↑ Expenditure records of "No on 98/Yes on 99"
- ↑ Expenditure records of "No on 87"
- ↑ Expenditure records of "No on 7"
- ↑ Expenditure records of "Yes on 74 and 76"
 |
This California-related article is a stub. You can help people learn about California politics by expanding it. |
